The Eisenhower matrix, explained.
A two-by-two grid that sorts work by two questions. Is it urgent? Is it important? Here is what goes in each box, where the idea came from, and how to use it without fooling yourself.
In short: the Eisenhower matrix, also called the urgent-important matrix or Eisenhower box, splits tasks into four quadrants. Do the urgent and important work first. Schedule the important work that isn't urgent. Delegate the urgent work that isn't important. Drop the rest.
The four quadrants
Draw a square and split it into four. Importance runs up the side. Urgency runs along the bottom. Every task lands in one of four boxes.
- Plan next year's hiring
- Write down a key process
- Build a client relationship
- Fix a client complaint
- Meet a regulatory deadline
- Handle a system outage
- Reformat an old report
- Most status emails
- Meetings with no decision to make
- Book the venue
- Routine data requests
- Most interruptions
1. Do it first: urgent and important
Real deadlines with real consequences. A client problem, a filing date, a broken system. Do these now, yourself. If this box is always full, it's a warning sign. Many quadrant 1 crises started life as quadrant 2 work that nobody scheduled.
2. Schedule it: important, not urgent
The work that moves the firm forward. Planning, hiring, training, building relationships, fixing processes. Nothing forces it to happen today, which is why it rarely happens at all. Put it in the diary with a date and an owner. This is the quadrant the matrix exists to protect.
3. Delegate it: urgent, not important
It has a deadline, but it doesn't need you. Hand it to someone it suits, or to a system. If nobody can take it, do it fast and keep it small. Watch for work that feels urgent only because someone else is chasing it.
4. Drop it: neither urgent nor important
Habits, busywork and low-value requests. Stop doing them. If dropping something feels risky, ask what would happen if it stopped for a month. Often the answer is nothing.
Urgent vs important
The matrix only works if you keep the two words apart. They feel similar in the moment. They are not the same thing.
| Urgent | Important | |
|---|---|---|
| Question it answers | When does this need doing? | How much does this matter? |
| What drives it | A deadline, or someone waiting | Your goals and values |
| How it feels | Loud. It demands attention. | Often quiet. It waits. |
| A test | What happens if this waits a week? | Does this move a goal we agreed? |
An urgent task that isn't important: a colleague needs a form signed before lunch. An important task that isn't urgent: deciding who succeeds the founder. Both are real work. Only one of them will shout for your time.
Before you place anything, write down what "urgent" and "important" mean for this exercise. For example: urgent means it must be done within four weeks. Important means it supports one of our three goals for the year. Teams skip this step more than any other. See why that causes trouble.
How to use it, step by step
- List everythingWrite down every task or initiative competing for time. Don't sort as you go.
- Agree the definitionsDecide what urgent and important mean here, with a time frame and a goal.
- Place each itemAsk the two questions one at a time. How urgent? How important? Place it on the grid.
- Act on each quadrantDo quadrant 1 now. Put quadrant 2 in the diary. Hand off quadrant 3. Cross out quadrant 4.
- Review itUrgency changes as deadlines move. Revisit the grid weekly for personal tasks, or quarterly for a team's initiatives.
Try it now with a team in the live demo below. Ten simulated voters have scored eight initiatives for a small advice firm.
Where it came from
The matrix is named after Dwight D. Eisenhower, the Second World War general and 34th President of the United States. The grid itself came later. It started with a remark.
On 19 August 1954, Eisenhower addressed the Second Assembly of the World Council of Churches at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois. He said:
"I have two kinds of problems, the urgent and the important. The urgent are not important, and the important are never urgent."Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1954. He credited the line to an unnamed former college president.
The grid came later. Stephen Covey turned the idea into a four-quadrant time management matrix in The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People in 1989. He expanded it in First Things First in 1994. Covey's numbering, with quadrant II as "important, not urgent", is still the most common way to label the boxes. The name "Eisenhower matrix" took hold as productivity writers credited the idea back to its source.
You'll see it under several names: the Eisenhower box, the Eisenhower method, the Eisenhower principle, the urgent-important matrix and the priority matrix. They all describe the same two-by-two.
Eisenhower matrix vs Covey's time management matrix
They are the same grid with different labels. Eisenhower's version is usually labelled by action: do, schedule, delegate, drop. Covey labelled the quadrants I to IV and focused on where people spend their time. His point was that effective people live in quadrant II and plan their way out of quadrant I.
| Box | Eisenhower label | Covey label (First Things First) |
|---|---|---|
| Urgent and important | Do it first | Quadrant I: necessity |
| Important, not urgent | Schedule it | Quadrant II: quality and personal leadership |
| Urgent, not important | Delegate it | Quadrant III: deception |
| Neither | Drop it | Quadrant IV: waste |
Common mistakes
- Putting everything in "Do it first". If more than a third of your items land there, your definition of urgent is too loose. Tighten the time frame.
- Confusing loud with urgent. A task isn't urgent because someone keeps asking. Ask what happens if it waits.
- Leaving importance undefined. Important to whom, for what goal? Without a stated goal, people rate by gut feel and the grid reflects mood.
- Delegating to nobody. "Delegate it" needs a name. If there's nobody to hand it to, the task is really in a different box.
- Never scheduling quadrant 2. Sorting is the easy part. The value comes from putting quadrant 2 work in the diary and protecting it.
- Using it once. Urgency decays. Last quarter's grid is out of date.
Using it with a team
The matrix was built for one person. When a team uses it, two new problems appear. The first opinion anchors everyone else. And people disagree about what's urgent without realising it.
The fix is to vote before you talk. Have everyone place each item privately, then reveal all the votes at once. Look at the spread as well as the average. Discuss the items where people disagree, then vote again. That's how the Eisenhower matrix for teams on this site works. For a full session plan, see how to run a prioritisation workshop.
Questions
What is the Eisenhower matrix also known as?
The urgent-important matrix, the Eisenhower box, the Eisenhower method, the Eisenhower principle and sometimes the priority matrix. Stephen Covey's version is called the time management matrix.
Who invented the Eisenhower matrix?
The idea comes from a 1954 remark by Dwight D. Eisenhower, who credited it to a former college president. Stephen Covey popularised the four-quadrant grid in 1989.
What is quadrant 2 of the Eisenhower matrix?
Quadrant 2 holds work that is important but not urgent. Planning, learning, hiring and relationship building all live here. It's the quadrant most people neglect and the one with the biggest long-term payoff.
What is an example of urgent but not important?
Booking a meeting room, answering a routine data request, or replying to an email that someone has chased twice. Each has a deadline. None needs your particular skills. More examples.
Is the Eisenhower matrix effective?
It's a good thinking aid and a poor measuring tool. It helps you notice where your time goes and protect important work. It struggles when people define urgent differently, which they usually do. Its limitations, and how to work around them.
Is there a free Eisenhower matrix template?
Yes. Download the printable Eisenhower matrix template as a PDF, or use the online version for a group.
Try it with your team.
Everyone votes privately. The reveal shows where you agree and where you split.